Nature & Science News
ClearlyExplained.Com

ClearlyExplained.Com


Cancer information on the web often unreliable

3 August 2004
by Richard Conan-Davies

A recent study of cancer information websites providing suggestions for cures, or prevention shows that about 1 in 10 of them are unreliable and possibly even dangerous.

The researchers came to this conclusion by surveying around 32 popular cancer cures or prevention style websites.

The research led by Edzard Ernst of Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, UK noted that Shark Cartilage was a common suggested therapy but very little study has been done on what types of cancers are affected and the only study done did not show any positive effects.

But there were some sites that had some good quality of information such as quackwatch.org. The key issue though is that it is important to consider very carefully what some website say. Consider for example the commercial interests of a site and too good to be true claims.

 

 

 

Related Links

Original Abstract Annals of Oncology


Nature & Science News
ClearlyExplained.com


©2004 ClearlyExplained.Com